四级真题2023年6月第一套Passage One

较难

难度

议论文

时文类型

社会

时文话题

大学

适合年级

奇速优课

时文摘要

分享:
时文录音
闯关习题描述一下时文录音

The United States is facing a housing crisis: Affordable housing is inadequate, while luxury homes abound (充裕) , and homelessness remains a persistent problem. Despite this, popular culture and the housing industry market happiness as living with both more space and more amenities (便利设施). Big houses are advertized as a reward for hard work and diligence, turning housing from a basic necessity into a luxury.

This is reflected in our homes. The average single-family home built in the United States before 1970 was less than 1,500 square feet in size. By 2016, the average size of a new, single-family home was 2,422 square feet. What’s more, homes built in the 2000s were more likely than earlier models to have more of all types of spaces: bedrooms, bathrooms, living rooms, dining rooms, recreation rooms and garages.

There are consequences of living big. As middle-class houses have grown larger, two things have happened. First, large houses take time to maintain, so cleaners and other low-wage service workers are required to keep these houses in order. Second, once-public spaces, where people from diverse backgrounds used to come together, have increasingly become privatized, leading to a reduction in the number of public facilities available to all, and a reduced quality of life for many. Take swimming pools. While in 1950, only 2,500 U.S. families owned pools, by 1999 this number was 4 million. At the same time, public municipal pools were often closed, leaving low-income people nowhere to swim.

The trend for bigger housing thus poses ethical questions. Should Americans accept a system in which the middle and upper classes enjoy a luxurious lifestyle, using the low-wage labor of others? Are we willing to accept a system in which an increase in amenities purchased by the affluent means a reduction in amenities for the poor?

I believe neither is acceptable. We must change the way we think: living well does not need to mean having more private spaces; instead, it could mean having more public spaces. A better goal than building bigger houses for some is to create more publicly accessible spaces and amenities for all.
最新评论
点击显示
本文翻译请先完成本篇阅读

奇速优课平台

轻松创业线上机构

免费了解

奇速英语 · 英语夏令营

7天单词特训

免费了解

奇速英语同步培优

单元知识点讲解+单元过关手册+常考易错题

学习
更多优质学习内容
奇速优课课程咨询
请填写信息
立即提交

四川奇速教育科技有限公司

网站备案号:蜀ICP备14006206号-4
Copyright @ 2018
All Rights Reserved.

帮助中心 百度统计 站内地图 新闻中心

联系我们

  
  

奇速公众号

星奇速

奇速优课